Warp vs Claude Code

1. Overview

This walkthrough compares Claude Code and Warp’s built-in coding agent — two tools built for AI-assisted development. Both can:

• Read and edit files

• Generate code diffs

• Plan multi-step tasks But they differ in experience, configurability, and performance.

---

2. Setup and Interface

Claude Code

• Runs as a CLI tool, requiring a terminal and the claude CLI installed.

• You type prompts directly into a command box.

• Supports file reading, search, and diff generation.

Warp

• Built directly into the Warp terminal.

• No installation needed — type a natural-language query or click the Agent button to enter Agent Mode.

• Handles the same operations as Claude Code but integrated into the environment you already use.

---

3. Reviewing Diffs

In Claude Code:

• You manually review diffs via CLI or external editors like VS Code.

• You can hit Shift + Tab to auto-accept all edits.

In Warp:

• You get a visual diff view built in.

• Accept, reject, or manually edit diffs inline using Warp’s lightweight editor.

• The agent automatically updates its context to avoid overwriting your changes.

---

4. Planning & Context Gathering

Both support planning mode for complex tasks:

• Claude Code uses a Markdown-style plan view.

• Warp can either show a similar plan or skip planning for short tasks.

For context:

• Both allow file references with @filename.

• Warp extends this with symbol referencing (@functionName) and a file tree explorer, letting you pull in specific lines and symbols as context.

---

5. Model Selection

Claude Code lets you pick between Claude 3 models (Sonnet, Opus, Haiku) via the /model menu.

Warp supports multiple ecosystems:

• Claude (Sonnet, Opus)

• GPT-5 (various reasoning levels)

• Gemini series

Switch models from the dropdown or directly in the agent menu.

---

6. Configuration

In Claude Code:

• Everything is configured via /commands in the CLI.

• Includes model switching, tool permissions, and sub-agent creation.

In Warp:

• Configure from Settings → AI & Agents.

• Add MCP servers, prompts, and global rules.

• Define Agent Profiles for read/write permissions, autonomy, and planning behavior.

• Maintain a global rules directory for consistent behavior across projects.

Warp also supports codebase indexing, which creates embeddings for faster semantic search across your repos.

---

7. Managing Agents Over Time

Claude Code:

• Shows progress directly in the CLI tab.

• Displays the current task name in the terminal tab title.

Warp:

• Adds visual indicators for agent status, progress, and toast notifications when blocked.

• Optional desktop notifications keep you informed when you’re multitasking.

---

8. Performance Comparison

Ben ran both tools on the same coding task — fixing a bug in the renderKeyboardShortcut function from a Sentry issue.

Claude Code results:

• Took ~2–4 minutes with Claude 3 Sonnet.

• Found the right issue and produced working code, though some redundant logic remained.

Warp results:

• With GPT-5, average time was ~1 minute 20 seconds.

• Consistent, high-quality output.

• Produced concise solutions with fewer redundant checks.

• Supported multiple models for experimentation.

---

9. Conclusions

Criteria	Claude Code	Warp
Environment	CLI tool	Integrated into terminal
Diff Review	External / Manual	Built-in panel
Planning	Markdown mode	Inline or Opus-assisted
Model Options	Claude only	Claude, GPT-5, Gemini
Configurability	CLI-based	UI + Profiles + Rules
Performance	2–4 min avg	~1.2 min avg (GPT-5)

TL;DR: If you prefer the Claude model suite and CLI workflow — go with Claude Code. If you want richer diff editing, context referencing, and model flexibility — Warp is the better fit.

“Claude Code gives you an AI terminal. Warp gives you an AI development environment.”