> For the complete documentation index, see [llms.txt](/llms.txt).
> Markdown versions of each page are available by appending .md to any URL.

# Share agent context in GitHub PRs

Share a Warp agent session or cloud agent run link in a GitHub pull request so reviewers can inspect the context behind agent-generated changes.

When an agent helps prepare a pull request, reviewers need the execution context behind the diff: the original prompt, plan, commands, validation results, code changes, and decisions that still need human review.

Add a Warp session or cloud agent run link to the PR description or a PR comment. That link gives reviewers a record of the agent’s work alongside the GitHub diff.

Use these Warp docs and surfaces to collect the right context:

-   [Agent Session Sharing](/agent-platform/local-agents/session-sharing/) for local Warp agents or third-party CLI agents running in Warp.
-   [Cloud agent session sharing](/agent-platform/cloud-agents/viewing-cloud-agent-runs/) for cloud agent runs started from Slack, Linear, GitHub Actions, schedules, the Oz CLI, or the API.
-   The [Code Review panel](/code/code-review/) and [Interactive Code Review](/agent-platform/local-agents/interactive-code-review/) to inspect and refine the actual code diff before or after you share the PR.

## What to include in the PR

Add the shared session link near the top of the PR description or as a pinned PR comment. Pair it with a short review summary so teammates can decide what to inspect first.

At minimum, include:

-   **Goal** - What the agent was asked to do.
-   **Agent context** - Link to the shared Warp session or cloud agent run.
-   **Changed files** - The main areas reviewers should inspect.
-   **Validation** - Tests, lint, typecheck, build, or manual checks the agent or author ran.
-   **Known risks** - Anything the agent could not verify, skipped, or changed speculatively.
-   **Reviewer asks** - Specific files, behaviors, or decisions that need human review.

## PR comment template

```
## Agent-generated change summary
**Goal:** <what the agent was asked to do>**Agent session:** <shared Warp session or cloud agent run link>**Changed files:** <key files or directories>**Validation:** <commands run and results>**Known risks:** <untested areas, assumptions, follow-ups>**Reviewer asks:** <specific review focus>
Notes:- The session link contains the agent prompt, plan, commands, logs, output, and follow-up messages where available.- Please review the code diff and the agent context before merging.
```

## 1\. Share the agent session or cloud run

Choose the link based on where the agent ran.

### Local agent or third-party CLI agent in Warp

If the agent ran locally in Warp, share the session:

1.  Open the agent session in Warp.
2.  In the conversation pane header, open the three-dot menu, then click **Share session**. Do not use the top-level **Share** icon if you need the session transcript.
3.  Choose the scrollback range to include.
4.  Copy the shared session link.
5.  Paste the link into the PR description or a PR comment.

See [Agent Session Sharing](/agent-platform/local-agents/session-sharing/) for the full sharing flow.

### Cloud agent run

If the agent ran in the cloud, use the cloud run session link:

1.  Open the run from the [Agent Management Panel](/agent-platform/cloud-agents/managing-cloud-agents/) in the Warp app or the [Runs page in the Oz web app](/agent-platform/cloud-agents/oz-web-app/#runs).
2.  Confirm the session shows the run context reviewers need.
3.  Copy the cloud agent session link.
4.  Paste the link into the PR description or a PR comment.

See [Viewing cloud agent runs](/agent-platform/cloud-agents/viewing-cloud-agent-runs/) for details.

## 2\. Review the diff before handing it off

Before asking teammates to review the PR, inspect the code yourself in Warp:

1.  Open the [Code Review panel](/code/code-review/).
2.  Compare the branch against the PR base branch, not just uncommitted changes.
3.  Review the changed files, revert obvious mistakes, and leave inline comments for the agent if it should revise anything.
4.  Run your project’s tests, lint, typecheck, or build.
5.  Add validation results to the PR summary.

For a detailed local workflow, see [How to review AI-generated code](/guides/agent-workflows/how-to-review-ai-generated-code/) and [Interactive Code Review](/agent-platform/local-agents/interactive-code-review/).

## 3\. Make the agent context easy to review

Reviewers should not have to read an entire transcript to understand what happened. In the PR summary, call out the most important parts of the session:

-   The original prompt or task source.
-   The plan the agent followed.
-   Commands that changed or validated the code.
-   Files or directories that need extra attention.
-   Any failed commands and how they were resolved.
-   Any assumptions the agent made.

If the PR came from an automated workflow, include the trigger source too. For example: Slack thread, Linear issue, GitHub Actions workflow, scheduled agent, Oz CLI command, or API call.

## 4\. Watch for sensitive context before sharing

Shared sessions can include prompts, terminal output, logs, command history, environment details, and other scrollback. Before putting a session link in a PR:

-   Check whether the session includes secrets, tokens, private customer data, or unrelated terminal output.
-   Choose the narrowest useful scrollback range for local session sharing.
-   Prefer links visible only to the reviewers who need the context.
-   If the agent produced logs or artifacts with sensitive values, remove or rotate those values before broader sharing.

See [Secret Redaction](/support-and-community/privacy-and-security/secret-redaction/) for more on how Warp helps detect secrets.

## 5\. Keep the PR review focused

Use the session link to make review faster, not to replace review. The GitHub diff is still the source of truth for what will merge.

Good reviewer asks:

-   “Check the migration and rollback path in `db/migrations/`.”
-   “Verify the agent’s test coverage for the auth edge cases.”
-   “Review the session commands around the failing lint step and the final fix.”
-   “Confirm whether the agent’s assumption about the API contract is correct.”

Avoid vague asks like “review the agent output.” Point reviewers to the decision, file, or validation result that needs human judgment.

## Next steps

-   Use [Agent Session Sharing](/agent-platform/local-agents/session-sharing/) to share local or third-party agent sessions.
-   Use [Cloud agent session sharing](/agent-platform/cloud-agents/viewing-cloud-agent-runs/) to inspect cloud agent runs.
-   Use [Code Review panel](/code/code-review/) to review Git diffs in Warp.
-   Use [Interactive Code Review](/agent-platform/local-agents/interactive-code-review/) to leave inline comments and send feedback back to an agent.